Table 1. Corpus sample for the noun plant.
Table 2. Sample corpus split for the target lemma plant. B(w) = 1.
Table 3. Sample corpus split for the non-target lemma plant. G(w) = 0.14 and B(w) = 0.
Table 4. Best and mean (Graded) and AP (Binary) scores across similarity measures (SIM). Scores are averaged over five iterations for models with a random component. The column ‘model’ gives the model with the best score. SGNS = Skip-Gram with Negative Sampling, CD = Cosine Distance, LND = Local Neighborhood Distance, SVD = Singular Value Decomposition, OP = Orthogonal Procrustes, WI = Word Injection, POLY = Polysemy Baseline, FREQ = Normalized Frequency Difference (NFD) Baseline, RAND = Approximate Random Baseline for Binary Classification.
Bamler, R., & Mandt, S. (2017). Dynamic word embeddings. In D. Precup & Y. W. Teh (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning (Vol. 70, pp. 380–389). International Convention Centre, Sydney, Australia: PMLR.
Bentivogli, L., & Pianta, E. (2005). Exploiting parallel texts in the creation of multilingual semantically annotated resources: the MultiSemCor Corpus. Natural Language Engineering, 11(3), 247261.
Blank, A. (1997). Prinzipien des lexikalischen Bedeutungswandels am Beispiel der romanischen Sprachen. T¨ubingen: Niemeyer.
Bybee, J. L. (2015). Language change. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Cook, P., Lau, J. H., McCarthy, D., & Baldwin, T. (2014). Novel word-sense iden-tification. In 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference: Technical Papers (pp. 1624–1635). Dublin, Ireland.
Cook, P., & Stevenson, S. (2010). Automatically Identifying Changes in the Semantic Orientation of Words. In N. C. C. Chair, K. Choukri, B. Maegaard, J. Mariani, J. Odijk, S. Piperidis, M. Rosner, & D. Tapias (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’10). Valletta, Malta: European Language Resources Association (ELRA).
del Tredici, M., & Fern´andez, R. (2017). Semantic variation in online communities of practice. In IWCS 2017 - 12th International Conference on Computational Semantics - Long papers.
Donoso, G., & Sanchez, D. (2017). Dialectometric analysis of language variation in twitter. In Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on NLP for Similar Languages, Varieties and Dialects (pp. 16–25). Valencia, Spain.
Dubossarsky, H., Hengchen, S., Tahmasebi, N., & Schlechtweg, D. (2019). Time-Out: Temporal Referencing for Robust Modeling of Lexical Semantic Change. In Proceedings of the 57th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics (pp. 457–470). Florence, Italy: Association for Computational Linguistics.
Dubossarsky, H., Weinshall, D., & Grossman, E. (2017). Outta control: Laws of semantic change and inherent biases in word representation models. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 1147–1156). Copenhagen, Denmark.
Fillmore, C. J., & Atkins, B. T. (2000). Describing polysemy: The case of ’crawl’. In Y. Ravin & C. Leacock (Eds.), Polysemy: Theoretical and computational approaches. Oxford University Press.
Francis, W. N., & Kucera, H. (1979). Brown corpus manual (Tech. Rep.). De-
partment of Linguistics, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, US.
Frermann, L., & Lapata, M. (2016). A Bayesian model of diachronic meaning change. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 4, 31–45.
Giulianelli, M. (2019). Lexical Semantic Change Analysis with Contextualised Word Representations. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
Hamilton, W. L., Leskovec, J., & Jurafsky, D. (2016a). Cultural shift or linguistic drift? Comparing two computational measures of semantic change. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 2116–2121). Austin, Texas.
Hamilton, W. L., Leskovec, J., & Jurafsky, D. (2016b). Diachronic word embeddings reveal statistical laws of semantic change. In Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) (pp. 1489–1501). Berlin, Germany.
Hellrich, J., & Hahn, U. (2016). Bad Company—Neighborhoods in Neural Embedding Spaces Considered Harmful. In Proceedings of COLING 2016 (pp. 2785–2796). Osaka, Japan.
Henrich, V., & Hinrichs, E. (2013). Extending the t¨uba-d/z treebank with germanet sense annotation. In I. Gurevych, C. Biemann, & T. Zesch (Eds.), Language Processing and Knowledge in the Web (pp. 89–96). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Hu, R., Li, S., & Liang, S. (2019). Diachronic sense modeling with deep contextualized word embeddings: An ecological view. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 3899–3908). Florence, Italy: Association for Computational Linguistics.
Jatowt, A., & Duh, K. (2014). A framework for analyzing semantic change of words across time. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (p. 229238). IEEE Press.
Karjus, A., Blythe, R. A., Kirby, S., & Smith, K. (2018). Challenges in detecting evolutionary forces in language change using diachronic corpora. CoRR, abs/1811.01275.
K¨oper, M., & Schulte im Walde, S. (2016). Distinguishing literal and non-literal usage of German particle verbs. In Proceedings of the 2016 conference of the north American chapter of the association for computational linguistics: Human language technologies (pp. 353–362). San Diego, California: Association for Computational Linguistics.
K¨oper, M., & Schulte im Walde, S. (2017). Improving verb metaphor detection by propagating abstractness to words, phrases and individual senses. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Sense, Concept and Entity Representations and their Applications (pp. 24–30). Valencia, Spain: Association for Computational Linguistics.
Kulkarni, V., Al-Rfou, R., Perozzi, B., & Skiena, S. (2015). Statistically signifi-cant detection of linguistic change. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW (pp. 625–635). Florence, Italy.
Langone, H., Haskell, B. R., & Miller, G. A. (2004). Annotating wordnet. In Proceedings of the Workshop Frontiers in Corpus Annotation at HLT-NAACL. Boston, MA, USA.
Lau, J. H., Cook, P., McCarthy, D., Gella, S., & Baldwin, T. (2014). Learning word sense distributions, detecting unattested senses and identifying novel senses using topic models. In Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) (pp. 259–270). Baltimore, Maryland: Association for Computational Linguistics.
Lin, J. (1991). Lin jh.. divergence measures based on the shannon entropy. ieee trans inform theory 37: 145-151. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 37, 145-I151.
McCarthy, D., Koeling, R., Weeds, J., & Carroll, J. (2004). Finding predominant word senses in untagged text. In Proceedings of the 42nd Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL’04), Main Volume (pp. 279–286). Barcelona, Spain.
Naumann, D., Frassinelli, D., & Schulte im Walde, S. (2018). Quantitative semantic variation in the contexts of concrete and abstract words. In Proceedings of the Seventh Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics (pp. 76–85). New Orleans, Louisiana: Association for Computational Linguistics.
N¨olle, J., Staib, M., Fusaroli, R., & Tyl´en, K. (2018). The emergence of systematicity: How environmental and communicative factors shape a novel communication system. Cognition, 181, 93–104.
Perrone, V., Palma, M., Hengchen, S., Vatri, A., Smith, J. Q., & McGillivray, B. (2019). GASC: Genre-aware semantic change for ancient Greek. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Computational Approaches to Historical Language Change (pp. 56–66). Florence, Italy: Association for Computational Linguistics.
Pilehvar, M. T., & Navigli, R. (2013). Paving the way to a large-scale pseudosense-annotated dataset. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (pp. 1100–1109). Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Pleyer, M. (2017). Protolanguage and mechanisms of meaning construal in interaction. Language Sciences, 63, 69–90.
Rosenfeld, A., & Erk, K. (2018). Deep neural models of semantic shift. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies
(pp. 474–484). New Orleans, Louisiana.
Rudolph, M. R., & Blei, D. M. (2018). Dynamic embeddings for language evolution. In WWW 2018 (pp. 1003–1011). ACM.
Sagi, E., Kaufmann, S., & Clark, B. (2009). Semantic Density Analysis: Comparing Word Meaning Across Time and Phonetic Space. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Geometrical Models of Natural Language Semantics (pp. 104–111). Stroudsburg, PA, USA.
Schlechtweg, D., Eckmann, S., Santus, E., Schulte im Walde, S., & Hole, D. (2017). German in flux: Detecting metaphoric change via word entropy. In Proceedings of the 21st Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (pp. 354–367). Vancouver, Canada.
Schlechtweg, D., H¨atty, A., del Tredici, M., & Schulte im Walde, S. (2019). A Wind of Change: Detecting and Evaluating Lexical Semantic Change across Times and Domains. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 732–746). Florence, Italy: Association for Computational Linguistics.
Schlechtweg, D., Schulte im Walde, S., & Eckmann, S. (2018). Diachronic Usage Relatedness (DURel): A Framework for the Annotation of Lexical Semantic Change. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (p. 169-174). New Orleans, Louisiana.
Sch¨utze, H. (1998). Automatic word sense discrimination. Computational Linguistics, 24(1), 97–123.
Shoemark, P., Liza, F. F., Nguyen, D., Hale, S., & McGillivray, B. (2019). Room to Glo: A systematic comparison of semantic change detection approaches with word embeddings. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) (pp. 66–76). Hong Kong, China: Association for Computational Linguistics.
Tahmasebi, N., & Risse, T. (2017). Finding individual word sense changes and their delay in appearance. In Proceedings of the International Conference Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (pp. 741–749). Varna, Bulgaria.
Tinits, P., N¨olle, J., & Hartmann, S. (2017). Usage context influences the evolution of overspecification in iterated learning. Journal of Language Evolution, 2(2), 148-159.